Justifications for common knowledge
نویسندگان
چکیده
Justification logics are epistemic logics that explicitly include justifications for the agents’ knowledge. We develop a multi-agent justification logic with evidence terms for individual agents as well as for common knowledge. We define a Kripke-style semantics that is similar to Fitting’s semantics for the Logic of Proofs LP. We show the soundness, completeness, and finite model property of our multi-agent justification logic with respect to this Kripke-style semantics. We demonstrate that our logic is a conservative extension of Yavorskaya’s minimal bimodal explicit evidence logic, which is a two-agent version of LP. We discuss the relationship of our logic to the multi-agent modal logic S4 with common knowledge. Finally, we give a brief analysis of the coordinated attack problem in the newly developed language of our logic.
منابع مشابه
Interactive Acquisition of Justifications: Learning “Why” by Being Told “What”*
In this paper I describe an approach to automated knowledge acquisition in which users specify desired system behavior by constructing justifications of examples. Justifications are explanations of why example behaviors are appropriate in given situations. I analyze the problem of acquiring justifications, showing how current knowledge acquisition techniques are best suited for asking what-ques...
متن کاملEpistemic Modeling with Justifications
Existing logical models do not fairly represent epistemic situations with fallible justifications, e.g., Russell’s Prime Minister example, though such scenarios have long been at the center of epistemic studies. We introduce justification epistemic models, JEM, which can handle such scenarios. JEM makes justifications prime objects and draws a distinction between accepted and knowledge-producin...
متن کاملKnowledge refinement in diagnostic expert systems
This paper presents a new methodology for the incremental refinement of a knowledge base consisting of inductive rules. The novelty of the approach resides in the use of a body of deep knowledge for guiding the process of rule refinement, even in case this deep knowledge is too complex or not specific enough to deductively generate classification rules. Justifications derived from the deep know...
متن کاملA Formal Theory of Justifications
We develop an abstract theory of justifications suitable for describing the semantics of a range of logics in knowledge representation, computational and mathematical logic. A theory or program in one of these logics induces a semantical structure called a justification frame. Such a justification frame defines a class of justifications each of which embodies a potential reason why its facts ar...
متن کاملRepresentation and Use of Explicit Justifications for Knowledge Base Refinements
We discuss the representation and use of justification structures as an aid to knowledge base refinement. We show how justifications can be used by a system to generate explanations – for its own use – of potential causes of observed failures. We discuss specific information that is usefully included in these justifications to allow the system to isolate potential faulty supporting beliefs for ...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید
ثبت ناماگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید
ورودعنوان ژورنال:
- Journal of Applied Non-Classical Logics
دوره 21 شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2011